We are going to have to move through material pretty quickly in the next several weeks. In order to expedite matters, I would appreciate it if you would skim the first two books (not chapters) of Euesebius of Caesarea's History of the Church for Tuesday's class (April 9). Read more carefully the first two pages and a few passages that particularly get your attention. We are going to be looking at Eusebius' strengths and weaknesses as a historian.
In my view, a good history should be interesting. Do Books I and II meet this standard? What do you find interesting in these books? Does Eusebius ever lose your attention? If so, why?
Please bring the book to class with you Tuesday.



None of us likes the feeling that we have failed at something, but, sooner or later, all of us seem to fail--and sometimes we feel like we have failed the really big test: life itself.

